[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?
From: |
Taylor R Campbell |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git? |
Date: |
Sat, 9 May 2009 15:10:04 -0400 |
User-agent: |
IMAIL/1.21; Edwin/3.116; MIT-Scheme/7.7.90.+ |
CVS may be crusty, but personally I'm still not remotely comfortable
using Git after some three-odd attempts to learn to use it. However,
if I'm the only one to whom it is nearly as unusably opaque as Arch,
then it is probably not worth stalling for my sake alone.
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/05/02
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/05/02
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Chris Hanson, 2009/05/04
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Amit Saha, 2009/05/04
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/05/04
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/05/09
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?,
Taylor R Campbell <=
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Chris Hanson, 2009/05/09
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Chris Hanson, 2009/05/09
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Marijn Schouten (hkBst), 2009/05/10
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Arthur A. Gleckler, 2009/05/10
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Chris Hanson, 2009/05/09