[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT Scheme on the AMD x86-64
|
From: |
Joe Marshall |
|
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT Scheme on the AMD x86-64 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:21:32 -0800 |
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Taylor R Campbell <address@hidden> wrote:
> You could
> try adding `define(DISABLE_387,1)' to x86-64.m4 to test that
> hypothesis.
Adding this seems to have fixed the problem.
--
~jrm
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT Scheme on the AMD x86-64, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/11/02
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT Scheme on the AMD x86-64, Arthur A. Gleckler, 2009/11/02
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT Scheme on the AMD x86-64, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/11/02
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT Scheme on the AMD x86-64, Arthur A. Gleckler, 2009/11/02
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT Scheme on the AMD x86-64, Chris Hanson, 2009/11/03
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT Scheme on the AMD x86-64, Chris Hanson, 2009/11/03
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT Scheme on the AMD x86-64, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/11/03
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT Scheme on the AMD x86-64, Chris Hanson, 2009/11/04