Re: Proposal: testing

[Rory Toma]

That's what I'm thinking.

I'd like a three process monitrc file (so we can have dependancy).

I propose:

apache (on non default port)
sshd (on non default port)

some other process that is easy to set up.

Once we nail down the processes, I'll take a stab at the monitrc file,
and try to add all the features.

On another note, I think for 4.x we can consolidate the
process/sysdep_*.c files into a single file. In the process of fixing
the FreeBSD/OpenBSD files, I've run into a lot of stuff that I think can
be commonized, if the right interfaces are used. (as a matter of fact,
OpenBSD, FreeBSD 5 and RH 9 kind of force you to use these interfaces
anyway...)


On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 18:22, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
> Rory Toma <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > I propose that we check in a standard monitrc file that has a few common
> > processes (apache comes to mind as one) and uses a rich set of features.
> > We can use this file on all platforms to test out monit, and can direct
> > users to use this file as well if they are having problems.
> 
> If you are thinking what I think you are thinking :) it is probably a
> good idea. That is; adding a common user test case (for us developers)
> by using a common monitrc file. At least we should think out how we
> can create test cases we should use during development. The code is
> starting to become rather complex and having some sort of automatic
> testing would be very useful.
-- 
Rory Toma               address@hidden
VP of Run Level 9       http://www.trs80.net
Digeo Digital           http://www.digeo.com

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part