Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Branch Naming

[Nathaniel Smith]

On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 04:38:18PM -0600, Matthew A. Nicholson wrote:
> Another benefit of doing things this way would be not having to enter a 
> host name all the time.  When one was excluded, print a warning and use the 
> collection name.

Afraid I don't follow.  Which proposal is "this way", and what do you
mean by the part after that?

("collections" only exist in the context of netsync, and are being
phased out anyway?)

-- Nathaniel

-- 
In mathematics, it's not enough to read the words
you have to hear the music