[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: more on commit without -b option
From: |
Lapo Luchini |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: more on commit without -b option |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:28:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 |
Thomas Keller wrote:
>> Would that be ok with you?
>
> Yes, I very much second this proposal, because it also means very low
> impact on other commands which rely on a proper "branch" setting in
> _MTN/options. The only commands which do have to know about a new
> "commitbranch" option are actually mtn branch, mtn commit and mtn revert
> (and maybe mtn status to display the setting).
http://monotone.ca/wiki/Branches/nvm.commit_without_-b/
I just propagated mainline into that branch... merge wasn't difficult
except a testcase which seemed a bit strange to me, but it compiles
correctly. I'll finish running the testsuite overnight.
What do we want to do with that branch?
Seems a nice approach to me...
--
Lapo Luchini - http://lapo.it/
- [Monotone-devel] Re: more on commit without -b option,
Lapo Luchini <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: more on commit without -b option, Thomas Keller, 2009/01/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: more on commit without -b option, Derek Scherger, 2009/01/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: more on commit without -b option, Derek Scherger, 2009/01/26
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: more on commit without -b option, Stephen Leake, 2009/01/26
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: more on commit without -b option, Zack Weinberg, 2009/01/26
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: more on commit without -b option, Matthew Nicholson, 2009/01/26
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: more on commit without -b option, Derek Scherger, 2009/01/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: more on commit without -b option, Matthew Nicholson, 2009/01/27