|
From: | Duncan Hull |
Subject: | [Myexperiment-discuss] myExperiment at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: why web 2.0 is failing biology |
Date: | Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:54:15 +0000 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) |
Robert Stevens wrote:
doesn't this miss the point?
It may miss many points, because it is aimed at publishers e.g. subtext is "how can science publishers make money from web 2.0".
However, I thought it made some points that are relevant to the success or failure of myExperiment and other web 2.0 tools.
1. scientists won't use new tools that don't save them time2. scientists won't use new tools without career incentives to do so (accreditation)
The first problem is something myExperiment can *really* do something about. The second one is a much harder problem...
Duncan Stating the bleedin' obvious...[1] http://www.cshblogs.org/cshprotocols/2008/02/14/why-web-20-is-failing-in-biology/
-- Duncan Hull http://duncan.hull.name +44 (0) 161 306 5138
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |