Re: [Nano-devel] patch updates

[David Lawrence Ramsey]

--- Chris Allegretta <address@hidden> wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:13:44PM -0800, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:
>> nanomiscbugs3.patch:
>> 
>> * sync'ed with latest CVS
>> * added a few more of DB's fixes (partial main() cleanup and
>> thanks_for_all_the_fish() tweaks); these seem to work, but I'm still
>> testing them
>> * fixed problem with missing ststusq() prompts with --enable-tiny; the
>> history element of the function call was not getting #ifdef'ed out when
>> NANO_TINY was defined and there was a 0 placeholder for where the
>> history would go, meaning that the 0 was interpreted as an empty char*
>> * renamed [have_]past_editbuff [have_]search_offscreen (Ken: is this a
>> clearer name for it?)
>
>Who the heck took out my checks for --preserve and --pico from main()? 
>If you don't have those, you will get the preserve message even if you
>invoke the editor with --preserve.  Plus I think it's useful to have the
>--pico flag check for explicitly as people may indeed use it and should
>be told what's happened.

Mea culpa.  When I was doing the partial merge of the main() cleanup, I 
accidentally removed those tests.  They're back in now, but I've just
noticed that another section of the cleanup that I didn't think was
needed actually was; without it, if there are conflicting options in the
nanorc and at the command line, the nanorc gets precedence.  I'm a bit
busy at the moment; I'll fix it (and update nanomiscbugs2a to account
for the new additions to nanorc.sample) as soon as I can.


_____________________________________________________________
Sluggy.Net: The Sluggy Freelance Community!

_____________________________________________________________
Select your own custom email address for FREE! Get address@hidden w/No Ads, 
6MB, POP & more! http://www.everyone.net/selectmail?campaign=tag