[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] updates, and relicensing questions...
|
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] updates, and relicensing questions... |
|
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:46:36 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
On Saturday 28 July 2007, Roberto J. Dohnert wrote:
> It makes sense to relicense if there is some kind of benefit to be had. To
> relicense just for the sake of relicensing makes no sense. If you do
> decide to go this route I may just fork the current Nano release and keep
> my fork under GPLv3 as I see no benefit what so ever to have from GPLv3.
the GPL-2 certainly allows you to fork however you want. i imagine this was
unintentional, but you should be aware that this sounds like a silly threat.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.