Re: [Nano-devel] updates, and relicensing questions...

[David Ramsey]

On 8/2/07, Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> sorry, i should have mentioned the explicit one i had in mind

No problem.  After reading through it, though, it seems to have thhe
same issues as CC-BY-SA 2.0...

> CC-BY-SA-3.0 is pretty common in the open source world for
> documentation ... the incompatibility question would come up when
> mixing documentation with different licenses which i dont think is an
> issue in the nano project ? documentation in nano is generated on the
> fly by people, not copy & pasted from other documentation ...

The issue is really with the fact that text from the nano source is also
in the documentation, so the licenses should be compatible if possible.

> when i hit this point of "all this licensing talk is getting out of
> hand", i just dump stuff into public domain ;)

And/or the WTFPL? ;)