[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] begin using gnulib?
From: |
Chris Allegretta |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] begin using gnulib? |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:40:19 -0500 |
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Benno Schulenberg
<address@hidden> wrote:
> That's fine by me. When people provide the patches.
Agreed, this sounds like something we should do eventually, but not at
any urgent pace.
> But what does this mean for support on other platforms?
> I suppose gnulib is also available on the BSDs. But on
> Windows?
>
> (Personally I don't care about supporting nano on Windows.
> But it seems that Chris is interested in this. Chris?)
I think cygwin will provide gnulib already for win32.
> And then: how much bigger is nano going to become
> because of using modules from gnulib? Surely some
> of those modules will contain functions that nano won't
> use. Are they still compiled into the binary?
Since it's dynamically linked against, it shouldn't AFAIK change
binary size significantly.
- [Nano-devel] [PATCH 1/2] check stat's result and avoid calling stat on a NULL pointer, Kamil Dudka, 2016/02/03
- [Nano-devel] [PATCH 2/2] use futimens() if available, instead of utime(), Kamil Dudka, 2016/02/03
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH 2/2] use futimens() if available, instead of utime(), Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/03
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH 2/2] use futimens() if available, instead of utime(), Kamil Dudka, 2016/02/03
- [Nano-devel] begin using gnulib?, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/02/04
- Re: [Nano-devel] begin using gnulib?, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/04
- Re: [Nano-devel] begin using gnulib?,
Chris Allegretta <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] begin using gnulib?, Kamil Dudka, 2016/02/05
Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH 1/2] check stat's result and avoid calling stat on a NULL pointer, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/02/06