[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nano-devel] the compiled size of nano
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
[Nano-devel] the compiled size of nano |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:51:12 +0100 |
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016, at 01:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 06 Feb 2016 19:03, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On a current Linux system, the size of nano is unchanged.
>
> i verified this statement after each patch in this series.
For me, before the patches, nano was 145480 bytes,
after applying all 8 patches, it was 149588 bytes.
(Stripped.)
Not a big difference, but still... some three percent.
But what I noted most: 'configure' takes at least twice
as long, :(, and 'make' creates a freaking lot of output.
Could the latter be silenced?
> my system:
> linux-4.4.0
> glibc-2.22
> gcc-5.3.0
Mine:
linux-2.6.32
glibc-2.14
gcc-4.4.3
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an
unladen european swallow
- [Nano-devel] [PATCH 1/8] add support for gnulib, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/06
- [Nano-devel] [PATCH 8/8] drop wchar.h/wctype.h/stdarg.h checks, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/06
- [Nano-devel] [PATCH 6/8] assume getopt_long support is always available, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/06
- [Nano-devel] [PATCH 3/8] drop getdelim/getline fallback functions, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/06
- [Nano-devel] [PATCH 4/8] drop isblank/iswblank fallback functions, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/06
- [Nano-devel] [PATCH 5/8] assume regex.h support is always available, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/06
- [Nano-devel] [PATCH 2/8] drop various str fallback functions, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/06
- [Nano-devel] [PATCH 7/8] drop glib fallback for snprintf/vsnprintf, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/06
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH 1/8] add support for gnulib, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/06
- [Nano-devel] the compiled size of nano,
Benno Schulenberg <=
Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH 1/8] add support for gnulib, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/02/07