[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 09:22:59 -0500 |
>>I believe Neil really meant to say that nmh can _only_ submit a message
>>using SMTP. Even when it's piping to sendmail, it's not using -t, it's
>>using -bs and speaking SMTP. The workstation doesn't have to listen on
>>port 25 in that case, obviously. This is assuming that you haven't
>>changed nmh to use -t (if you did, hey, that's fine ... I just want to
>>be sure we're talking about the same thing).
>
>That's not quite correct. If you use "spost" for your postproc",
>then it will use "sendmail -t" or something similar. But "spost" is
>certainly not the normal way of doing things. The default is, as you
>say, to invoke "sendmail -bs" and talk smtp over stdio, or to talk
>smtp to localhost (depends on a configuration choice).
Ahh, I always forget about that. But it would be easy to add the
functionality to add a "-f" option; that would work for sendmail
and any sendmail-compatible MTS.
>>I'm just not happy with the overloading of an existing header.
>
>Why a header, rather than an environment setting?
Well ... I have no real attachment to a header. That's was more of a
suggestion. It occurs to me that you might want to change it on a
per-message basis. So maybe an environment variable, and a header
to override it.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Scott Schwartz, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, schwartz+l-nmh-workers, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, schwartz+l-nmh-workers, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Neil W Rickert, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, schwartz+l-nmh-workers, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Neil W Rickert, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, schwartz+nmh-workers, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Paul Fox, 2004/02/03