[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:18:33 -0500 |
>| (e.g., "Nmh-Return-Path"), so there is no confusion and it's completely
>
>That's better than nothing, of course.
>
>So what about Sender? Will we be allowed to set that header?
Sender, I have no problem with. That's clearly something designed to be
supplied by the MUA. nmh's handling of it always seemed a bit odd.
Same goes with Resent-Sender.
>And can we make "masquerade: draft_from" the default?
You mean, the default in the shipped mts.conf, or the default without any
entry in the mts.conf? I think I'd prefer the former, rather than the
latter.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Scott Schwartz, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Scott Schwartz, 2004/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Robert Elz, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Scott Schwartz, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, schwartz+l-nmh-workers, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, schwartz+l-nmh-workers, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Neil W Rickert, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, schwartz+l-nmh-workers, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Neil W Rickert, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Ken Hornstein, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, schwartz+nmh-workers, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] File upload frustration, Paul Fox, 2004/02/03