Re: [Nmh-workers] content-disposition (was Re: flattening continuation lines )

[Oliver Kiddle]

Paul Fox wrote:
> so basically, the entire text between the { } pair would fully
> specify the Content-disposition header, but that unlike
> Content-description (which has no default value), the
> Content-disposition header would have a default value of
>       attachment; filename="<file basename>"
> does that sound right?

Yes

In some situations (such as multipart parts), it would default to adding
no Content-disposition header and where there is no filename because the
content is specified inline, it would use a value of inline for the
header. I'll have a closer look at what other mailers produce.

Oliver