[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0
From: |
Joel Reicher |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:29:53 +1100 |
> but more importantly, there's no way to easily view messages in a
> sequence (like your "thread", above), sequentially, right? if
> not, then simply getting the message numbers of the thread isn't
> all that useful, since i still can't easily read them in order.
>
> i want to isolate the thread, and then be able to prev and next
> through it. so i think your method might be okay, if there were
> a "-seq" option to prev and next, which meant "next in sequence".
What Jerry has said, and much more, is covered in the mh-sequence man
page.
Cheers,
- Joel
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Paul Fox, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Michael Richardson, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Joel Reicher, 2005/12/22
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0, Bill Wohler, 2005/12/22
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0, Bill Wohler, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0,
Joel Reicher <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Chad Walstrom, 2005/12/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
[Nmh-workers] Replace mh-format?, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] Replace mh-format?, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22