[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0
From: |
Harald Geyer |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:38:17 +0100 |
> > No, but most of the time this is not necessary. However sortm -thread
> > would be a nice thing. And pick -thread <message number> too.
>
> I think pick and sortm are definitely the right place to start with
> this. Are you thinking pick -thread should gather sibling and parent
> threads?
Personally I still believe that processing messages within a thread by
date is the natural thing to do. So I have picking whole threads in mind.
But of course Bill and the others, who like more elaborate threading will
consider at least the following useful:
-thread
-subthread
-parent
-allparents
I guess if anybody considers these useful enough, each will get
implemented.
- [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, pmaydell, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Harald Geyer, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Paul Fox, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Michael Richardson, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Joel Reicher, 2005/12/22
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0, Bill Wohler, 2005/12/22
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0, Bill Wohler, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Joel Reicher, 2005/12/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Chad Walstrom, 2005/12/22