Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header

[Lyndon Nerenberg]

On Feb 1, 2006, at 7:22 PM, David Levine wrote:

> The "almost" part is that mhbuild currently creates
> Content-Description instead of Content-Disposition.  I
> hijacked the Content-Description information and used it to
> form the Content-Disposition header (with or without
> -attach).  (Is that a good idea?  Or, should
> Content-Description be maintained, and new code and data
> fields added to support Content-Disposition?  I have no need
> for Content-Description.)

No, it's not a good idea ;-)

Just yesterday I had to construct some messages using both - 
description and -disposition.  We need to figure out a syntax  
extension that will support generating both headers.

--lyndon