[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header
From: |
Oliver Kiddle |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:53:16 +0100 |
David Levine wrote:
> I want:
>
> #text/plain <>[attachment; filename="foo.txt"] /tmp/foo.txt
> #application/pdf <>[attachment; filename="foo.pdf"] /tmp/foo.pdf
I don't see why you can't take something like the following:
#text/plain; name="foo.txt"; <>[description] /tmp/foo.txt And pull the
name= part out and use it for the filename in Content-Disposition.
That'd add backward compatibility with old scripts that generate mhbuild
directives automatically.
And having to write out "attachment" in full is too verbose. I would
make "attachment" the default and use a single character, `-' perhaps,
to indicate "inline".
> The "almost" part is that mhbuild currently creates
> Content-Description instead of Content-Disposition. I
> hijacked the Content-Description information and used it to
> form the Content-Disposition header (with or without
> -attach). (Is that a good idea? Or, should
> Content-Description be maintained, and new code and data
> fields added to support Content-Disposition? I have no need
> for Content-Description.)
Content-Description should be maintained. I would prefer if attach left
it empty by default. It's supposed to describe the content and not
describe the type of the content type that's a different matter.
Oliver
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied,
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended
recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all
copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
- [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header, David Levine, 2006/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header, David Levine, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header, David Levine, 2006/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header, David Levine, 2006/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header, David Levine, 2006/02/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header, David Levine, 2006/02/18