[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nmh-workers] Re: Editing MIMEd messages
From: |
Bill Wohler |
Subject: |
[Nmh-workers] Re: Editing MIMEd messages |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Feb 2006 09:28:12 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jon Steinhart <address@hidden> writes:
> The mhbuild stuff allows access to the guts. But, it is not a viable
> user interface for non-geeks, and is too difficult to use for casual
> attaching files to messages.
>
> Nothing in the attachment code that I added eliminated the mhbuild stuff.
> It just adds an easier-to-use user interface that invokes mhbuild.
Sounds like MH-E already does what you propose. We call mhbuild
implicitly upon sending, but the user, such as Jerry ;-), can always
invoke it manually (`C-c C-e') before sending to see (and edit) the
MIME stuff.
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Should attachment header handling be in send?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Should attachment header handling be in send?, Scott Schwartz, 2006/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Should attachment header handling be in send?, Joel Reicher, 2006/02/01
- [Nmh-workers] Editing MIMEd messages, Jerry Peek, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Editing MIMEd messages, Jon Steinhart, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Editing MIMEd messages, Joel Reicher, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Editing MIMEd messages, etc., Jon Steinhart, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Editing MIMEd messages, etc., Joel Reicher, 2006/02/03
- [Nmh-workers] Re: Editing MIMEd messages, Bill Wohler, 2006/02/04
- [Nmh-workers] Re: Editing MIMEd messages,
Bill Wohler <=