[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nmh-workers] Re: Editing MIMEd messages
|
From: |
Bill Wohler |
|
Subject: |
[Nmh-workers] Re: Editing MIMEd messages |
|
Date: |
Sat, 04 Feb 2006 09:39:36 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Joel Reicher <address@hidden> writes:
> One more thing. Would anyone object to profile components like
> Attach-Header: X-MH-Attach
> Forward-Header: X-MH-Forward
I haven't followed the discussion about these fields, but I can speak
to the proposed names. Note that RFC 2822 and MH call individual
header fields "header fields" or just "fields". The "header" refers to
the entire message header or the show header. While we might use
header casually when we mean a field (although it would be better to
get into better habits), let's keep the user-visible stuff consistent
to avoid possible surprise or confusion.
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Should attachment header handling be in send?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Should attachment header handling be in send?, Scott Schwartz, 2006/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Should attachment header handling be in send?, Joel Reicher, 2006/02/01
- [Nmh-workers] Editing MIMEd messages, Jerry Peek, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Editing MIMEd messages, Jon Steinhart, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Editing MIMEd messages, Joel Reicher, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Editing MIMEd messages, etc., Jon Steinhart, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Editing MIMEd messages, etc., Joel Reicher, 2006/02/03
- [Nmh-workers] Re: Editing MIMEd messages,
Bill Wohler <=
- [Nmh-workers] Re: Editing MIMEd messages, Bill Wohler, 2006/02/04