[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder
From: |
Norman Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:46:44 -0800 |
Joel Reicher <address@hidden> writes:
>> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:07:47 +1100
>> From: Joel Reicher <address@hidden>
>> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
>>
>> | In fact, there looks to be a host of inconsistent behaviour. "+/" will
>> | scan the root *directory*. "+.." does *not* scan the directory above
>> | the folder root, but rather the directory above that. "+." scans the
>> | directory above the folder root.
>>
>> That's not what I see. scan +. for me scans the current folder,
>> scan +.. scans the parent of the current folder. scan +/ certainly
>> attempts to scan the root directory, but that's no different than
>> scan +/any/absolute/path which is needed when you want to look in
>> someone else's MH folders (assuming, of course, that you have permission).
>...
>> ps: I am using a slightly old version of nmh ...
>> scan -- nmh-1.0.4 [compiled on lilac.noi.kre.to at Sat Jan 24 12:50:44 UTC
>> 2004]
>
>I'm using the CVS code, and I made some changes to the folder path
>processing a while ago, so it's more than likely the inconsistent
>behaviour has been introduced (by me) since 1.0.4.
>
>If everyone's happy with "+" meaning the folder root and "@" meaning
>the current folder and anything following being interpreted the same
>as any pathspec would be then I'll clean up the code and try to get
>around to making sure it's documented properly too.
NO. I'm not quite happy with that, in that I would prefer
that
+ foobar
mean the same thing as +foobar. That way wild card expansion in shell scripts
and file name completion in interactive shells would be much easier.
Norman Shapiro
798 Barron Avenue
Palo Alto CA 94306-3109
(650) 565-8215
address@hidden
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder, Dan Harkless, 2007/02/25
Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder, Joel Reicher, 2007/02/25
Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder, Robert Elz, 2007/02/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder, Joel Reicher, 2007/02/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder, Jerrad Pierce, 2007/02/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder, Joel Reicher, 2007/02/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder, Norman Shapiro, 2007/02/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder, Neil W Rickert, 2007/02/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder, Dan Harkless, 2007/02/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder, Robert Elz, 2007/02/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder, Mike O'Dell, 2007/02/28
Re: [Nmh-workers] The invisible mail folder, David Levine, 2007/02/26