[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] cleaning out the cobwebs
From: |
Jon Steinhart |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] cleaning out the cobwebs |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:03:10 -0700 |
> >Well, yeah, that is what I'm thinking about. Seems silly to have m_getfld
> >call
> >something that sort of looks like m_getfld but is different. Making it work
> >down
> >to all of the body parts would in my mind be architecturally better for nmh.
> > But,
> >as you say, more work.
>
> So why not create a "new and improved" but robust and backwards-compatible
> m_getfld
> by a different name to implement the new behavior? It can then be tested for
> awhile
> with the new features and once it proves reliable, replace the existing calls?
> (perhaps with an experimental build option for "early adopters" to do so now).
>
> It's a few more steps, but you otherwise seem to get the best of both worlds?
> Modern code for the future without discarding stable spaghetti of the present.
I could do that. But, as I tried to say earlier, I can't do it because I don't
*really* understand what m_getfld does. I have a general idea, but not enough
to think that I could really duplicate it easily.
Jon
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cleaning out the cobwebs, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cleaning out the cobwebs, Peter Maydell, 2010/11/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cleaning out the cobwebs, Jon Steinhart, 2010/11/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cleaning out the cobwebs, Peter Maydell, 2010/11/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cleaning out the cobwebs, Jon Steinhart, 2010/11/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cleaning out the cobwebs, Peter Maydell, 2010/11/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] cleaning out the cobwebs, Ken Hornstein, 2010/11/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] cleaning out the cobwebs, belg4mit, 2010/11/02
Re: [Nmh-workers] cleaning out the cobwebs, Jeffrey Honig, 2010/11/02
Re: [Nmh-workers] cleaning out the cobwebs, belg4mit, 2010/11/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cleaning out the cobwebs,
Jon Steinhart <=