[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term
|
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term |
|
Date: |
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:27:18 +0000 |
On 2011-12-12, at 2:03 AM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> Yeah, I think we're all on the same page here. I'm all in favor of reducing
> our #ifdef mess.
I'm on the road for the next week and a bit, but as soon as I get back I'll
push my POSIX work onto the working branch I created. It's not complete yet,
but it's a fair ways along the path of getting rid of a lot of that cruft.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Experimental version: mmh, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, David Levine, 2011/12/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Jon Steinhart, 2011/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Jon Steinhart, 2011/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term, Ken Hornstein, 2011/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh in near, medium, and far-term,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=