Re: [Nmh-workers] urls from mhpath, and message store abstraction layers.

[Joel Uckelman]

Thus spake Earl Hood:
> Wrt to mhpath, I think it is getting over analyzed.  All
> mhpath does is provide the *path* to an nmh resource,
> that's it.
> 
> Issues like fetching or not fetching are out-of-scope.
> 
> If/when IMAP support is added in, mhpath will return
> imap URLs.  If one is using the existing classic storage
> model, then local pathnames are returned.

IMAP URLs aren't paths, at least not in the sense I take 'path' to have
in 'mhpath'. Maybe we could add 'mhurl' to produce URLs (and file: URLs
for local storage!) and leave mhpath producing paths?

-- 
J.