[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?
From: |
jon |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken? |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:48:06 -0700 |
David Levine writes:
> Jon wrote:
>
> > Well, no. I did a "yum update" and things stopped working. I did
> > not install from source. I would be unable to get any work done if
> > I had to read the release notes on every package upgrade.
>
> I sympathize, but the diagnostic message that you got seems
> sufficient to me.
>
> /usr/share/doc/nmh-1.5/NEWS
>
> David
I've been on vacation. There were about 400 packages upgraded today.
Imagine if each one broke something.
Jon
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, jon, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, jon, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Tethys, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/07/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, David Levine, 2012/07/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, David Levine, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?,
jon <=