[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers? |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:37:55 +0100 |
Hi Paul,
> > folder +inbox
> > refile @example last # Means +inbox/example.
>
> huh. i believe you, but you might have just found a bug in the man
> pages. :-) i can find no mention of such a feature.
Me neither. Historically,
$ g -B3 TSUBCWF docs/ChangeLog_MH-3_to_MH-6.6
Wed Jul 18 03:01:11 1984 Rand MH mail system (agent: Marshall Rose)
<address@hidden>
Install the code necesary for the @folder notation, meaning
+cwf/folder (TSUBCWF).
$
@.. naturally works too and is quite handy.
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?, David Levine, 2012/10/14