[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:06:31 +0100 |
Hi Jerrad,
> Commands which take a folder name (inc, refile, scan, sortm, ...)
> will accept the folder name in two formats: '+folder' and
> '@folder'. '+folder' specifies a folder underneath the Path
> defined in your nmh profile e.g; with the default '''Path:
> Mail''', '+folder' tells nmh to use ''~/Mail/folder''. '@folder'
> specifies a path relative to the current folder specified in your
> ''context'' file e.g; with '''Current-Folder: inbox''', and the
> same profile, '@folder' tells nmh to use ''~/Mail/inbox/folder''.
Is `scan +/tmp/foo' documented anywhere, i.e. the ability to treat any
directory as a folder, not just one under Path? And address@hidden' after
that...
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?, David Levine, 2012/10/14