[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:42:45 -0500 |
>:-)
>So you are saying that if don't give a '-nostrict" argument to the
>utility that checks for standard conformance the line length limit is
>998 characters, but I give a "-strict argument the line length limit
>will be 72 characters?
Well ... I hate things like "-strict", because that is a term which is
very subjective.
>As I read the man page for the utility the default is -nostrict. :-)
Let's move to IETF termology and use -should and -must. I'm sure others
will speak up, but MY understanding is the IETF default is "-should -must".
-Ken
- [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, norm, 2012/12/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/04
- [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, norm, 2012/12/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Jon Steinhart, 2012/12/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, norm, 2012/12/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, norm, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, norm, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Michael Richardson, 2012/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, norm, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Earl Hood, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05