[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:35:23 -0800 |
On 2012-12-05, at 5:28 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> I'm sorry, I'm still skeptical. Please, I'd like ONE example of a
> nmh user that submits email to a SMTP server which cannot handle
> 8-bit messages. Remember that I'm not talking about a random SMTP
> server on the Internet; something that we _actually_ have users that
> _submit_ mail to. I assert that the number of users who meet this
> criteria is 0 (I will admit that it's impossible for me to prove this
> assertion; it's only possible for it to be disproved).
Then you need to poll the entire internet. Not every nmh user subscribes to
this mailing list.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Michael Richardson, 2012/12/04