[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:31:59 +0000 |
Hi Lyndon,
> Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> > Is an override required? It could always try to send 8-bit...
>
> Which could fail if the system has an MTA that doesn't do 8bit.
The RFC covers what to do in this case; either downgrade to 7-bit or
fail to pass it on with an error.
> And there might be other reasons the user needs a different encoding.
IIRC one of the MTAs in the chain can upgrade the message from seven to
8-bit just as others can downgrade; I'm not sure the user can enforce
an end-to-end 7-bit transfer.
> Don't assume everyone is using SMTP as their transport.
I didn't; "When nmh hands over the email to send using SMTP". :-)
Some advocacy, including opinionated. :-)
http://cr.yp.to/smtp/8bitmime.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_SMTP#List_of_supporting_servers_2
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05