[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld
From: |
Jon Steinhart |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:10:13 -0800 |
David Levine writes:
> And Jon wrote:
>
> # I would like any m_getfld replacement to have the ability to extract
> # information about MIME message parts which means finding headers in
> # the middle of bodies. As per postings some years ago, I would like to
> # add code for reading attachments that needs this feature.
>
> I think that m_getfld should retain its current interface,
> unless it needs to be fixed or can be tidied up to benefit
> those 72 callers. It should continue to spit out header
> fields and a body. Message parts should be provided by some
> layer, with a more natural API, that's above it.
>
> David
Well, I'm not too concerned about the exact API for this as long as it's
reasonably doable. Just seems to me that m_getfld is already scanning
the message, and MIME has made it so that one has to scan further in order
to get all of the "headers". So it seems like a natural place for it.
Jon
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/11
- [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., chad, 2012/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., Chad Brown, 2012/12/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/11
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 2012/12/11
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 2012/12/16