Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld

[norm]

Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Message parts should be provided by some
>>>layer, with a more natural API, that's above it [m_getfld],
>>
>>Then you might want to also consider bringing out the functionality of
>>that layer as a user accessible command or maybe a pair of commands
>>analogous to mhstore and mhlist.
>
>Wouldn't it make more sense to switch mhstore and mhlist over to the new
>API?
>
>--Ken

I don't know. I don't know that the new API looks like. Also, there might be 
some difficulty, keeping  mhstore and mhlist upward compatible with their 
older, less powerful, versions. This might adversely affect the design of the 
new programs' interfaces.


    Norman Shapiro