[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Jan 2013 22:56:41 -0500 |
ken wrote:
> - Remove dbm/ndbm dependency. The ONLY reason nmh has a dependency on
> a db library is for duplicate suppression in slocal; if slocal finds
> a duplicate Message-ID, it discards it. I didn't think getting a dbm
> library was so hard, but apparantly it is under Linux; the autoconf
> stuff for this is a giant mess. I'm wondering ... do people actually
> use this functionality? I'm thinking the days of using slocal in
> your .forward file have slowly been coming to an end. At the very least
> we should make this functionality optional ... that would make things
> easier for Paul Fox, if no one else :-)
yow! that's a 9 year old thread you're referring to!
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 13.6 degrees)
- [Nmh-workers] Content-MD5 header field (was: Garbage collection), (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Paul Vixie, 2013/01/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Mike O'Dell, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/01/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/01/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Jeffrey Honig, 2013/01/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/04
Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection,
Paul Fox <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/01/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Michael Richardson, 2013/01/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Bill Wohler, 2013/01/04