[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ...
From: |
chad |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ... |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Jan 2013 13:03:41 -0800 |
On 08 Jan 2013, at 11:30, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
>> One thing to keep in mind when thinking about that line is that inc is
>> typically synchronous, where our use of fetchmail/procmail (or whatever)
>> is asynchronous. By the time we step up to MH, everything is already in
>> a folder or in the local maildrop ready for +inbox (or already in
>> +inbox). I don't want to have to wait for inc to go to my remote server.
>
> I just timed inc ... to go to my POP server, which included Kerberos
> authentication (4 extra round trips), download a small test message
> (session was encrypted), write it out (to a network filesystem, no less),
> and exit, it took:
>
> 0.04 real 0.01 user 0.00 sys
>
> Are you really THAT impatient, Bill? :-) Ok, fine ... going across the
> global internet for all that will be a lot worse. But most of the time
> I never notice it unless there's a problem.
Bill has been known to use a satellite modem from a boat in the Pacific, so
he might care about network latency more than most. :-)
Is there still interest in offline IMAP support for NMH? That was eventually
a killer for me.
~Chad
- [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Jeffrey Honig, 2013/01/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Bill Wohler, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ...,
chad <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Bill Wohler, 2013/01/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/01/10
- Prev by Date:
Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ...
- Next by Date:
Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ...
- Previous by thread:
Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ...
- Next by thread:
Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ...
- Index(es):