[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ...
From: |
Bill Wohler |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ... |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2013 16:27:48 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
chad <address@hidden> writes:
> On 08 Jan 2013, at 11:30, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>> One thing to keep in mind when thinking about that line is that inc is
>>> typically synchronous, where our use of fetchmail/procmail (or whatever)
>>> is asynchronous. By the time we step up to MH, everything is already in
>>> a folder or in the local maildrop ready for +inbox (or already in
>>> +inbox). I don't want to have to wait for inc to go to my remote server.
>>
>> I just timed inc ... to go to my POP server, which included Kerberos
>> authentication (4 extra round trips), download a small test message
>> (session was encrypted), write it out (to a network filesystem, no less),
>> and exit, it took:
>>
>> 0.04 real 0.01 user 0.00 sys
>>
>> Are you really THAT impatient, Bill? :-) Ok, fine ... going across the
>> global internet for all that will be a lot worse. But most of the time
>> I never notice it unless there's a problem.
Heh heh. That's pretty impressive.
> Bill has been known to use a satellite modem from a boat in the Pacific, so
> he might care about network latency more than most. :-)
:-). We just spent a week on a boat in the Caribbean (diving on the
Cayman Islands) and wireless Internet was expected. Not so just ten
years ago. But these days my network latency isn't that bad.
> Is there still interest in offline IMAP support for NMH? That was eventually
> a killer for me.
>
> ~Chad
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nmh-workers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
>
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> aka <address@hidden>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
- [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Jeffrey Honig, 2013/01/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Bill Wohler, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., chad, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ...,
Bill Wohler <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] inc, slocal, procmail, ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/01/10