[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nmh-workers] --prefix=/usr/local issues
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
[Nmh-workers] --prefix=/usr/local issues |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:13:54 -0700 |
On 2013-03-18, at 7:36 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> I configured and compiled with --prefix /usr/local
> and things worked fine. Unfortunately, the whatnow
> prompt reports the following when I try to send:
> unable to exec /usr/local/nmh/lib/post: No such file or directory
Unrelated, but this reminds me of another nit I have with --prefix.
Currently we install the etc stuff into ${prefix}/etc, which spams
/usr/local/etc pretty hard when faced with --prefix=/usr/local. Personally,
I'm not a fan of the /usr/local/nmh default prefix, and would prefer to see it
changed to /usr/local, with the configdir stuff pushed down a level to
$prefix/etc/nmh. (And libexec stuff in $prefix/libexec/nmh, etc) I think most
people expect things to install this way, and just show up in their $PATH
(which, presumably, already has /usr/local/bin in place).
--lyndon
- [Nmh-workers] configure --prefix problem with whatnow/post, belg4mit, 2013/03/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] configure --prefix problem with whatnow/post, Ken Hornstein, 2013/03/18
- [Nmh-workers] --prefix=/usr/local issues,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] --prefix=/usr/local issues, Ken Hornstein, 2013/03/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] --prefix=/usr/local issues, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/03/18
- [Nmh-workers] 1.6, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/03/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/03/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6, Ken Hornstein, 2013/03/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.6, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/03/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] --prefix=/usr/local issues, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/03/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] --prefix=/usr/local issues, norm, 2013/03/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] --prefix=/usr/local issues, Paul Fox, 2013/03/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] --prefix=/usr/local issues, Ken Hornstein, 2013/03/21