[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:26:33 -0400 |
>so it looks to me like this command:
>
> /home/pgf/src/pdom/nmh/nmh.git/test/testdir/inst/usr/local/nmh.git/lib/slocal
> -maildelivery /home/pgf/src/pdom/nmh/nmh.git/test/testdir/Mail/maildelivery
>should have produced the .actual file, but didn't. the contents of that
>maildelivery file is:
>* 1 qpipe A "/usr/bin/tee
>/home/pgf/src/pdom/nmh/nmh.git/test/testdir/13697.actual"
So ... seems like the key problem there is:
./test/slocal/test-slocal: "grep ^delivering
/home/pgf/src/pdom/nmh/nmh.git/test/testdir/10982.actual2" expected:
'delivering to pipe "/usr/bin/tee", success.'
but instead got:
'delivering to file
"/home/pgf/src/pdom/nmh/nmh.git/test/testdir/Mail/maildrop" (mbox style),
success.'
It's not correctly delivering the file to /usr/bin/tee. So ... why? Hm.
Given the maildelivery file you listed:
* 1 qpipe A "/usr/bin/tee
/home/pgf/src/pdom/nmh/nmh.git/test/testdir/13697.actual"
That breaks down to:
* - match any header
1 - I guess this is just a placeholder?
qpipe - "Quoted pipe"
>From the messages that you've listed ... it doesn't sound like that was being
read. Maybe the wrong maildelivery file is being read? We supply the
-maildelivery flag so it _should_ work, but maybe it isn't. Maybe some
work with a system call tracer would let you make sure it's reading the
right file. Otherwise putting some breakpoints in the localmail() and
usr_delivery() functions for slocal should get to the bottom of the problem.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/02
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers,
Ken Hornstein <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, David Levine, 2013/04/17
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, David Levine, 2013/04/18