[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Does maildrop work correctly with nmh?
From: |
Bill Wohler |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Does maildrop work correctly with nmh? |
Date: |
Sun, 12 May 2013 21:26:05 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
One thing I have my todo list is to consider sieve as a replacement to
procmail. It would be great to hear from anyone who is actually using
sieve.
Martin McCormick <address@hidden> writes:
> I certainly appreciate the suggestions and discussion
> this question caused. I have given up for now. The real problem
> I was trying to solve is that when procmail is determining what
> to do with a particular message, all the straight-forward
> text-based recipes are worthless when what blows through is a
> spew of base64 or html unless you are looking for just one word
> and it is unique enough not to accidentally be part of html
> code.
>
> Oh well. It was an interesting exercise.
>
> Thanks to all.
>
> Martin McCormick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nmh-workers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
>
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> aka <address@hidden>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Does maildrop work correctly with nmh?,
Bill Wohler <=