Re: [Nmh-workers] Does maildrop work correctly with nmh?

[rader]

I looked into it seriously but stayed with procmail... I ended up automating
the creation of my procmailrc from a file that looks a whole lot like a
~/.maildelivery file.  That makes the configuration information far more
dense, easily grep'able and results in verbose logging.

steve
-- 

On Sun, May 12 2013 at 9:26pm PDT, Bill Wohler <address@hidden> wrote:
 > One thing I have my todo list is to consider sieve as a replacement to
 > procmail. It would be great to hear from anyone who is actually using
 > sieve.
 > 
 > Martin McCormick <address@hidden> writes:
 > 
 > >    I certainly appreciate the suggestions and discussion
 > > this question caused. I have given up for now. The real problem
 > > I was trying to solve is that when procmail is determining what
 > > to do with a particular message, all the straight-forward
 > > text-based recipes are worthless when what blows through is a
 > > spew of base64 or html unless you are looking for just one word
 > > and it is unique enough not to accidentally be part of html
 > > code.
 > >
 > >    Oh well. It was an interesting exercise.
 > >
 > >    Thanks to all.
 > >
 > > Martin McCormick
 > >
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > Nmh-workers mailing list
 > > address@hidden
 > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
 > >
 > 
 > -- 
 > Bill Wohler <address@hidden> aka <address@hidden>
 > http://www.newt.com/wohler/
 > GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
 > 
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > Nmh-workers mailing list
 > address@hidden
 > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
 >