[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:50:46 -0500 |
ken wrote:
> couldn't find it. I will note that Dcc support is a relatively new
> feature compared to group address removal, and is not universally loved
> by the greybeards:
>
> revision 1.2
> date: 1989/05/03 16:25:05; author: sources; state: Exp; lines: +4 -2
> add "Dcc:" header line. This is basically a blind distribution copy.
> addresses listed on Dcc: lines are put in the envelope only!
> I don't intend to document this since Bcc: is the socially appropriate
> header to use for such copies.
> /JLR
>
> That's as far back as the files we have under revision control. And just
> for the record, my beard is starting to show a few streaks of grey :-)
>
> I don't think there's any objection to documenting this behavior, is there?
> I know, it's in the MH Book, but we should have a brief mention of this
> in the base man pages.
yes, we certainly should. bcc confused me for years, in that it
was different than the bcc feature i found in other mailers. when
i finally found dcc, it started making sense.
paul
----------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 36.7 degrees)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, Robert Elz, 2013/12/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, Ken Hornstein, 2013/12/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, P Vixie, 2013/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, Ken Hornstein, 2013/12/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/12/06
Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/12/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, David Levine, 2013/12/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, David Levine, 2013/12/03