[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:55:25 -0500 |
>> I'm not sure how to write some documentation here that is clear; I
>> prefer using RFC termology whenever possible, so I'd still like to
>> say "group".
>
>Don't say "group", say "blind list". It happens to look
>like a group, but this is in a draft.
Ok, fair enough; I get your point.
>Here's why:
>
> Anyway, I was all set to allow and ignore semicolons at the
> end of aliases in lists. But that would break the EXMH
> alias parser on what would then be valid expressions.
>
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2012-10/msg00039.html
Sigh. It's always something, isn't it? But given that there's explicit
handling for blind list expansion in post, fixing the documentation is
probably the right thing to do anyway.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/12/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, David Levine, 2013/12/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support, David Levine, 2013/12/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 5322 group support,
Ken Hornstein <=