Re: [Nmh-workers] tmp file cleanup

[David Levine]

Bill wrote:

> David Levine <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >> >I expect that there are:  anything that's relative to the MH Path
> >> >is susceptible.  But again, there may be users out there who depend
> >> >on it, and moreso than $TMP.
> >> 
> >> I'm all for backwards compatibility, but in this case I'm with Lyndon:
> >> I wouldn't even hesitate chucking this over the side.
> >
> > I hate it when upgrades break my configuration.  And I know
> > I'm not the only one :-)
> >
> > I'll look into deprecating it (".." in a folder name).  I don't
> > see a big rush to yank it, given the personal extent of nmh.
> 
> Isn't making a relative MHTMPDIR relative to MH Path just as much a
> change as disallowing relative paths?

No longer an issue:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2014-01/msg00070.html

David