[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing
|
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing |
|
Date: |
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 21:30:47 -0400 |
>> - Parse the address headers, as needed.
>[...]
>
>Do you mean doing lazy evaluation of the header structures? Just curious ...
Yeah. We'd store the original contents of the headers, of course, but they
wouldn't go through any additional parsing until they were accessed.
--Ken
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/09
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/09