[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7 |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:53:52 -0400 |
>>>I guess my question
>>to you would be, if we had a new mhl-like program that was MIME-aware,
>>why would you want to keep the old mhl around?
>
>Only to not break any scripts out there, that use it.
As much as I love tormenting Jon Steinhart every time we change something
in a new nmh release, I'm trying to understand what would break. Well,
okay, I'm sure something somewhere will break for someone. But I think
if we have an old-style mhl configuration file around we can revert to
the previous behavior.
But it would be good to hear from users; if mhl changed and started (for
example) parsing MIME messages and only displaying text parts, would that
break things for you?
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7, norm, 2014/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7, norm, 2014/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7, Jon Steinhart, 2014/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7, Jon Steinhart, 2014/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7, Jon Steinhart, 2014/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7, Jon Steinhart, 2014/08/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7, norm, 2014/08/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7, Jon Steinhart, 2014/08/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Items for nmh 1.7, Andreas Wittkemper, 2014/08/19