Re: [Nmh-workers] First idea of a Bison-based address parser available

[Ralph Corderoy]

Hi Ken,

> Across different rules, where does the CFWS end up at when a reduction
> happens?  However, it really doesn't matter where CFWS ends up since
> we ignore it (except for the case of the old-style addresses).

Rather than settle all the shift/reduce conflicts with %prec, etc.,
could it be that a different parsing technique would be more suited,
e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsing_expression_grammar always
picks the first rule so you can remove ambiguity by careful ordering.
Still work required, but different work.  :-)

Cheers, Ralph.