[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
From: |
Valdis . Kletnieks |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1) |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:56:31 -0400 |
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 22:18:21 +0100, Ralph Corderoy said:
> I tend to think those (X-)?Mailer headers are a bit of a waste of space
> and time. The same value in thousands of copies of emails. All those
> bytes, clock cycles, etc., when nothing cares about the value.
Until you're trying to track down a weird bug and root-cause it to the
fact that Lotus Notes uses different values for boundary= on a multipart/
(it uses two blanks in the header, but only one in the body), so my .procmailrc
has in it:
# Lotus Notes is a boil on the buttocks of e-mail.,...
:0 hwf
*^X-Mailer:.*(IBM|Lotus) Notes
| sed -e 's/boundary="=_alternative /boundary="=_alternative /'
You spend a few decades doing e-mail support as one of your hats, you learn
to be glad that MUA's put in X-Mailer:, and most MTA's stick a 'with $software'
clause into their Recieved: headers.
pgpToSpW4tdys.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1),
Valdis . Kletnieks <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Oliver Kiddle, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/16