Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)

[David Levine]

Ken wrote:

> I can boil it down to this: these headers may leak out, if there are bugs
> or unusual behavior.  But I have realized ... I don't care.

I do care.  "Be conservative in what you do"

> Thinking about it more, we already leak some "internal" headers out.

Water under the bridge.  Let's do the right thing moving forward.

You mentioned "harm":  it depends on how that's defined.  Sure, MUAs can
igore headers, so no harm there.  But, I define each of intentionally
withholding traceability and polluting a namespace as harmful.

> I mean, yeah, it's not something we should do,

Then let's not.

David