[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1) |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:55:36 -0400 |
Ken wrote:
> So if traceability is the major concern, would a User-Agent header
> address everyone's issues?
No, because:
Nmh-Attach: foo
User-Agent: nmh-1.7
is more informative than:
Attach: foo
User-Agent: nmh-1.7
And, "This means, moving forward, we only generate nmh-* headers,
while continuing to accept the old ones."
David
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Robert Elz, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2016/10/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1),
David Levine <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Andy Bradford, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Robert Elz, 2016/10/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Robert Elz, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/10