[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
From: |
Andy Bradford |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1) |
Date: |
14 Oct 2016 13:46:58 -0600 |
Thus said David Levine on Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:16:38 -0400:
> "X-" headers are deprecated by RFC 6648. We could add, say, a Mailer
> header.
While the RFC does say this:
3. SHOULD NOT prefix their parameter names with "X-" or similar
constructs.
Why? What's wrong with "X-"? If the intent of RFC 6648 is to do away
with any special interpretation of "X-" in headers, then why make such a
statement thus giving a new special interpretation of "X-"? Shouldn't
"X-" be just as useable as any other prefix in a header post-RFC6648?
Thanks,
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 4000000058013656
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Robert Elz, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2016/10/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1),
Andy Bradford <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Robert Elz, 2016/10/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Robert Elz, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Valdis . Kletnieks, 2016/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/11