[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.7 release date
|
From: |
David Levine |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.7 release date |
|
Date: |
Sun, 30 Oct 2016 17:29:50 -0400 |
Ralph wrote:
> It occurs to me that it may be quicker to write tests that aim to
> increase coverage rather than test actual output against expected, etc.
> That would then give valgrind more to chew on. They could then be
> fleshed out separately, especially if they were marked in some way, to
> have their results checked.
I prefer that the output always be checked. If valgrind doesn't find a
problem, it doesn't mean that the output is correct.
David